I continue to work on my
fitness nutrition certification. As I
have mentioned before, there is a lot of nutrition information out there, on
the web, in magazines, in our friends’ heads.
Some of the information is better and some of it is misleading or plain
old wrong.
My text offers the following
advice from the American Dietetic Association on assessing the credibility of
websites. I am including some comments
as well, because the most important thing to remember is to engage our critical
faculties when deciding what is most likely to be true and correct. Here goes:
•
What is [sic]
(apparently knowing the nutrition stuff does not mean they know the grammar
thing; they wanted to say “are.”) the background, credibility, and affiliation
of the researchers or sources?
•
Does the
website identify the publisher and any sponsors? (The kind of people who need to ask this
probably also need to be told why this might be important. Sponsors who, say, manufacture the product in
question, have a vested interest in providing information that is positive
about the product.)
•
Does the
website say who wrote it or how it was approved?
•
Is the
information up-to-date?
•
Does the
information include credibly references such as peer-reviewed journals?
•
Does the
information present both [sic] (What?
Some kinds of information have WAY more than two perspectives to consider. Also, um, some stuff is just plain bad for
us; there is no other side…) perspectives of (ON, people. ON the issue.) the issue?
•
Is the
information balanced and [does] it state any caveats?
•
Is the
website designed to sell products?
•
Are there
links that provide support or more detail?
I realize I am a cranky
older student compared to the target audience of the text. That said, can we please decide as a culture
that we are in favor of critical thinking and maybe even proofreading and grammar?
I keep doing my
homework. May we all continue to do the
same.