I didn’t read a book this
week because I’ve been studying my nutrition text and it is long and I take
notes the old-fashioned way (My kid said, “What are you doing?” I said, “Copying out the chapter learning
objectives, writing out the vocabulary definitions, and taking chapter notes.” He said, “Whoa! You actually do all that stuff they tell you
to do in school. I didn’t think anybody
actually did that!”) because it works for me.
However, because reading leads to thinking (“A dangerous pastime!”), I
found myself wondering about placebos.
My other kid, handily
enough, is a librarian, so when my personal internet search skills fail, I call
him in to find out what I want to know; this is the privilege I get for having
taken him to the library in the first place.
I had two main
questions. The first one was about the
inactivity of placebos. I’ve been
reading in a variety of places and experimenting on my own bodily chemistry set
(not scientifically valid, but personally useful) about sugar, so the use of “sugar
pills” as placebos made me wonder how the decision was made that a substance had
no effect. It turns out that not having
an effect is not important; it is not having an effect on the condition in
question.
The second one was about
placebos and exercise research. The gold
standard for research is a double-blind study in which neither the
experimenters nor the subjects know who is in the experimental group and who is
in the control group. It is challenging
not to know whether we are exercising or not, so I wondered if some smart
people had figured out a way around it.
The answer is no. What tends to
happen is that several groups of people with whatever condition are randomly
assigned to an exercise group (or one of several exercise groups) or a control
group “waiting list.”
At this point, everyone
may be wondering why I even care. I
believe in science, but it has to be good science, well-conducted, ethical, and
verifiable. We all need to think about
how science is made and use our critical faculties to evaluate the claims and
assumptions embedded in our science.
This makes us smarter and less likely to be hoodwinked by those who
would like to exploit us.